Deliberation and decisions in the IRB process
Abstract
Institutional review boards (IRBs) regularly vote to resolve conflict. This article argues that voting minimizes protections for human subjects and violates moral order. Rather than vote, IRBs should be mediating disputes, which respects the moral difference and integrity of IRB members.Downloads
Published
2013-11-03
Issue
Section
Festschrift in Honor of Dr. Victor Sidel